<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>San Francisco Consult &#187; Internet Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/category/internet-governance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng</link>
	<description>Marketing 2.0: Customer relationship management morphs into conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 10:29:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s idea of privacy still a strange one with Open Graph</title>
		<link>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2010/facebooks-idea-of-privacy-still-a-strange-one-with-open-graph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2010/facebooks-idea-of-privacy-still-a-strange-one-with-open-graph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 10:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Publishing and Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy on the Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a copy of a good article from Network World on FaceBook&#8217;s new approach to privacy: one that consists intelling our friends about the sites we visited without asking for our consent first.  The article seems to indicate this was an unintended glitch from Facebook, but it sure is a good way to get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2010/facebooks-idea-of-privacy-still-a-strange-one-with-open-graph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Needed change in Internet Governance: a view from the Non Commercial Users Group</title>
		<link>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2009/needed-change-in-internet-governance-a-view-from-the-non-commercial-users-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2009/needed-change-in-internet-governance-a-view-from-the-non-commercial-users-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Governance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an article by Andy Oram, reproduced from Oreilly Radar news

 Internet Governance a new unique global challenge after US Sept 30 decision 
People interested in coalitions and policy-making on a global scale&#8211;topics that are increasingly relevant in a world whose borders are irrelevant to carbon dioxide, flu viruses, and other critical entities&#8211;need to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2009/needed-change-in-internet-governance-a-view-from-the-non-commercial-users-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who has a voice in running the Web?</title>
		<link>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2009/who-has-a-voice-in-running-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2009/who-has-a-voice-in-running-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Governance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever given thought to how the Web is run?  It's a rarity in today's world in that it is mostly run by a non profit entity based in the US: ICANN.  Now that the web has gained in importance and impact since 1986,when ICANN was founded, voices are springing up and asking that all constituents' points of views be heard in how the Web is managed:in particular, how domain names can be owned and who manages these domain names.

One organization, NCUC]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2009/who-has-a-voice-in-running-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Advocate&#8217;s Free Speech Rights Upheld in UDRP Trademark Proceeding</title>
		<link>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2008/consumer-advocates-free-speech-rights-upheld-in-udrp-trademark-proceeding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2008/consumer-advocates-free-speech-rights-upheld-in-udrp-trademark-proceeding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Publishing and Web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is reproduced from an article on Citmedialaw.org.  It&#8217;s an interesting decision concerning freedom of speech online and the use of trademarks.  It&#8217;s also a glimpse into how expression on the web is managed today.  The web is a new creation that has its own laws and governance, really, especially in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sanfranciscoconsult.com/editorials/eng/2008/consumer-advocates-free-speech-rights-upheld-in-udrp-trademark-proceeding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
